Your trusted source for the latest news and insights on Markets, Economy, Companies, Money, and Personal Finance.

A second trial of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried on costs not within the cryptocurrency fraud case offered to a jury that convicted him in November isn’t needed, prosecutors advised a choose Friday.

Prosecutors advised U.S. District Choose Lewis A. Kaplan in a letter that proof at a second trial would duplicate proof already proven to a jury. Additionally they stated it might ignore the “robust public curiosity in a immediate decision” of the case, notably as a result of victims wouldn’t profit from forfeiture or restitution orders if sentencing is delayed.

They stated the choose can think about the proof that might be used at a second trial when he sentences Bankman-Fried on March 28 for defrauding clients and traders of no less than $10 billion.

Bankman-Fried, 31, who has been incarcerated since a number of weeks earlier than his trial, was convicted in early November of seven counts, together with wire fraud, wire fraud conspiracy and three conspiracy costs. He might face many years in jail.

Final spring, prosecutors withdrew some costs that they had introduced in opposition to Bankman-Fried as a result of the costs had not been authorised as a part of his extradition from the Bahamas in December 2022. They stated the costs might be introduced at a second trial to happen someday in 2024.

Nevertheless, prosecutors on the time stated that they’d nonetheless current proof to the jury on the 2023 trial in regards to the substance of the costs.

The fees that had been quickly dropped included conspiracy to make illegal marketing campaign contributions, conspiracy to bribe overseas officers and two different conspiracy counts. He additionally was charged with securities fraud and commodities fraud.

Of their letter to Kaplan, prosecutors famous that they launched proof about the entire dropped costs throughout Bankman-Fried’s monthlong trial.

They stated authorities within the Bahamas nonetheless haven’t responded to their request to carry the extra costs at a second trial.

A conviction on the extra costs wouldn’t lead to a possible for an extended jail sentence for Bankman-Fried, prosecutors stated.

“Continuing with sentencing in March 2024 with out the delay that might be attributable to a second trial would advance the general public’s curiosity in a well timed and simply decision of the case,” prosecutors wrote. “The curiosity in avoiding delay weighs notably closely right here, the place the judgment will possible embody orders of forfeiture and restitution for the victims of the defendant’s crimes.”

When reached by CBS Information, attorneys for Bankman-Fried declined to remark, as did the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace for the Southern District of New York.¬†

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post
Next Post
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read next
Boeing will plead responsible to a legal fraud cost stemming from two crashes of 737 Max jetliners that killed…
Costco cracking down on membership sharing Costco cracking down on membership sharing 00:23 Wholesale retailer…
Though Individuals helped stave off a recession in 2023 by spending sufficient to propel financial development,…